Al-’Allaamah Rabee’ Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee on Yahyaa al-Hajooree and His Followers

 

[fap_track id=”3155″ layout=”list” enqueue=”no” button_enqueue=”no”]

 

In the audio clip provided above, the Noble Scholar of al-Jarh wat-Ta’deel, Shaykh Rabee’ Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee – hafidhahullaah – says:

  1. Concerning the view of Yahyaa al-Hajooree and his followers, “All of the Salafiyyeen are innovators now…all of them are innovators now.  The callers and the Scholars, all of them are beneath his feet now.”
  2. Concerning the followers of Yahyaa al-Hajooree, “Complaints have come to us from all regions of the earth.  Perhaps an individual learns for two days, three months, two months and then he goes far away, to Russia saying, “’Ubayd, ’Ubayd, Yahyaa.”  Yahyaa is above the heavens and ’Ubayd is an innovator. [1] This is their da’wah.  Britain, Sudan, Egypt, Turkey, Kenya, Libya, all of the nations are loaded with hatred against the Salafiyyeen and Salafiyyah.
  3. Shaykh Rabee’ said, “We have remained patient for seven years, whilst letters and complaints were coming to us.”
  4. When a students says, “Advise him, O Shaykh, and write him a letter, Shaykh Rabee’ replies, “I have already advised him, and I have advised him, and I have advised him, and I have advised him concerning what he has.  And at times the advice would go on for two and a half hours.  And he would not listen and he would return and he would not have fulfilled his share, may Allaah bless you.  And his students are extremists (ghulaat), with extremism that has no match.  Meaning, imaamuth-thaqalayn (Imaam of mankind and the Jinn) and an-naasihul-ameen (trustworthy advisor) [2]…extremism and extremism and extremism.”
  5. Shaykh Rabee’ says to the student, “Go to him and advise him.  Do not campaign for him and do not applaud him and take positions as men with regards to him.”

 

The recording was made on Wednesday night, the 1st of Jumaadaa al-Oolaa 1434H, between the Maghrib and ’Ishaa‘ Prayers.

 

Endnotes:
[1]: Yahyaa al-Hajoree and his followers continue to launch scathing attacks upon the noble Scholar, al-‘Allaamah ‘Ubayd Ibn ‘Abdullaah al-Jaabiree – hafidhahullaah – whom Shaykh Rabee’ has recently described as an Imaam in Salafiyyah in Hajj of 1433H.  Refer to: http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=134490
[2]: These are titles which the followers of Yahyaa al-Hajooree have repeated ad nauseam.

al-‘Allaamah ‘Ubayd Ibn ‘Abdullaah al-Jaabiree on Taking Knowledge from Books

[fap_track id=”3101″ layout=”list” enqueue=”no” button_enqueue=”no”][wpdm_package id=61]

The Noble Scholar, al-‘Allaamah ‘Ubayd Ibn ‘Abdullaah Ibn Sulaymaan al-Jaabiree was asked,

O Shaykh, may Allaah preserve you, can it be said that knowledge must not be taken, except from the mouths of the mashaayikh and the Scholars; and it is not to be taken from the internet and books?  And what is the instruction concerning that when the Prophet (‘alayhis-salaam) has said in a hadeeth saheeh, “Document knowledge through writing.”?

The Noble Scholar answered this question as follows,

There is no evidence in this hadeeth for this claim.  The hadeeth says, “Document knowledge…” Meaning, document whatever you have taken from a Scholar so that it does not escape you.  However, that which I have come to know from the biographies of the people of knowledge is that they did not prohibit taking knowledge from books at all.  They only called to taking knowledge from the mouths of its people.  This is the primary basis.  Yes.  And based upon this, it is possible to say that knowledge is obtained through two paths:

  1. The ideal path and the origin is to take knowledge verbally from its people.
  2. And the second path is utilized due to a need and incapability and it is to take knowledge from books.

And they used to say in times of old, “The individual whose Shaykh is his book, then his errors will outnumber his correct positions.”  Yes.

However, when the individual attains knowledge by studying under a Scholar or Scholars and takes the usool (foundations) of Sharee’ah knowledge from them and the ways of deriving rulings from proofs, or using texts as proofs for issues or ijmaa’ (consensus) with proficiency in Sharee’ah knowledge, then there is nothing to prevent him from researching independently and looking and applying what he took from his Shaykhs.

And perhaps a need within a country from amongst the countries may call for a man or men to look into the books of the people of knowledge and convey what they see to the people of their country, due to their need for it, and they do not have the ability to look into the issues and select the correct view.  No, they do not have the ability.  However, for example, an individual reads from books of the trusted Scholars in the topics of ‘aqaa`id (beliefs) and in the topics of fiqh (jurisprudence) and he clarifies and explains to the people what he understands then,

Allaah does not burden a soul with more than it can bear.” [Sooratul-Baqarah 2:286]

This is what he can bear.

Allaah does not burden a soul with more than it can bear.” [Sooratul-Baqarah 2:286]

And it is not permissible to prohibit the people from the likes of him, those who are in need of him.  Yes.

Then the Noble Shaykh was asked,

Shaykh, what if he reads to the people when he does not have knowledge and he says that he is reading from the likes of Shaykh Ibn Baaz (d.1420H) and Shaykh Ibnul-‘Uthaymeen (d.1421H)?  What should he do when he encounters disagreement (khilaaf) in some of the subsidiary issues?  This is with regards to the stronger action and with regards to reading to the people.

So the noble Shaykh replied,

This is something he does not have originally – meaning proficiency with which to distinguish the correct position from the weaker one.  However, this is his ability.  Yes, this is his ability.  And whosoever from amongst them is upon goodness and righteousness, then you will find that when a Scholar comes who is stronger than him, he entrusts the affair to the Scholar.  Yes.

End of Shaykh ‘Ubayd’s words.

SOURCE: These were questions that were posed to Shaykh ‘Ubayd in 1431H.  The recording can be obtained from the mosque in the Shaykh’s neighbourhood.

Translation by Maaz Qureshi

Ash-Shaykh al-’Allaamah Saalih Ibn Muhammad al-Luhaydaan (hafidhahullaah) on the Disbelief of the Nation of Islam

[fap_track id=”3025″ layout=”list” enqueue=”no” button_enqueue=”no”][wpdm_package id=60]

[Q]: All praises are for Allaah, Lord of everything that exists and may His peace and Prayers be upon Muhammad, his family and his Companions. As to proceed:

O Shaykh there is found in America a religious sect who call themselves “The Nation of Islam” and they claim to be upon Islaam. Their beliefs are as follows:

  1. That generally, every black person is an incarnate of Allaah, specifically he is in the form of a man named Fard Muhammad, and that all whites are devils.
  2. That Muhammad (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) was not the seal of all Prophets and Messengers and that Elijah Muhammad was indeed the last prophet and that he is the messiah and Mahdee expected to appear in the last days. They also deny Allaah resurrecting the creation and they consider the Resurrection to be a metaphor of one exiting from ignorance and gaining knowledge, and they have many other aspects of creed which are clear disbelief.

So the question, O Shaykh, is firstly: Is this sect a disbelieving sect, outside of the fold of Islaam. Second, what is the ruling on the common folk from amongst them? Third, are these individuals excused due to them living far away from the Scholars of Islaam and fourth, what is your advice to those who hesitate in declaring these individuals to be disbelievers?

[A]: In the name of Allaah the Most Beneficent, Most Merciful, all praises are for Allaah, and may His peace and prayers be upon His Messenger, the one whom Allaah sent as a mercy to the whole of mankind, and has made him the seal of all Prophets and Messengers. Thus, there is no prophet or messenger that will come after him.

These individuals, who were described in these three questions, are not Muslims. Did they accept Islaam before this as to say that they are even apostates?! It is not clear to me that they ever accepted Islaam. Their belief is a branch of that of the Hulooliyyah (those who say Allah becomes incarnate with His creation), however they claim that Allaah became incarnate within the blacks, and they claim that the whites are devils. And this is something that they use to offend and spite the whites. So in reality, the Muslim is a brother of a Muslim, and a condition for one to enter Islaam, is to testify that no deity has the right to be worshipped in truth except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah, and there is no prophet after him. The Muslim also believes in Allaah, His Angels, His revealed Books, His Messengers, the Day of Resurrection, and believe in His Pre-Ordained Decree, the good and bad of it. Whoever does not believe in this, they are not a Muslim or a Believer (mu‘min). So whoever’s belief and creed is the likes of what was mentioned in the questions are not Muslims. Rather they are not Jews or Christians. Without a doubt, there is no Jew or Christian that comes after the sending of Muhammad (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) except none of their actions will be accepted if they do not believe in Muhammad and enter the true Religion of Allaah. The destination of this person will be the Hellfire.

The Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said,

“There is not a Jew or Christian who hears about me and then dies not believing in what I was sent with (i.e. Islaam) except they will be from the people of the Hellfire.” [Related by Muslim (no. 240) and Ibn Mandah in Kitaabul-Eemaan (no. 401).]

Furthermore, I do not think that a Muslim who understands Islaam can have any doubt and hesitate in the disbelief of these individuals. There is no doubt in the disbelief of these individuals, and the common folk amongst them are not excused! The Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) did not excuse the disbelievers from the Arabs who died and those who remained living up until Muhammad was sent. He did not say they are excused because of their ignorance. Rather, he mentioned when a person came to him and asked him,

“What was the end result of my father?”  He (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said, “Your father and my father are both in the Hellfire.” [Related by Muslim (no. 203).]

Allaah the Most High says,

It is not for the Prophet or those who believe to seek forgiveness for the disbelievers, even if they were relatives.” [Sooratut-Tawbah 9:113]

Therefore it is not permissible for any Muslim to seek forgiveness for anyone who died upon disbelief. As for these individuals (i.e. the Nation) there is no doubt regarding their disbelief, and there is no doubt in the disbelief of those who know what they are upon and then say, “I do not declare them to be disbelievers.” The truth is that there is no such thing in this world as religions.

Indeed, the only religion accepted by Allaah is Islaam.” [Soorah Aali-’Imraan 3:18]

Also, Allaah says,

Whoever desires a religion other than Islaam, it will never be accepted from him.” [Soorah Aali-’Imraan 3:85]

So you find people who say, “religion, religion.” There are no religions in the world because whoever follows a religion other than that of Islaam, they are following a religion of falsehood. There is no difference between a Jew, Christian, Magian, or the idol worshipper who does not know about any of these religions but rather worships graves and other gods that they invent and call upon. All of this is disbelief, without a shadow of the doubt.

However, it is incumbent that these individuals (i.e. the nation) be advised for those who are able to do so. Allaah the Mighty and Majestic did not become incarnate with anything from His creation, nor did anything from His creation become incarnate with Him. This is merely the belief of the people of Hulool who distorted this from those who believe in Wahdatul-Wujood, meaning that everybody is Allaah and Allaah is everybody. And more amazing than this are these individuals who call to Wahdatul-Wujood and call themselves the Hulooliyyah, they do not exempt even the animals. They say that there is no such thing as the servant and Allaah (being separate) and all of this is clear misguidance, except that which the Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) was upon and his Companions.

Allaah mentions,

Call to the way of your Lord with wisdom and with a good admonition, and debate with them in a way that is better.” [Sooratun-Nahl 16:125]

And He says,

Say (O Muhammad): This is my path, I invite to Allaah upon clear knowledge, me and those who follow me.” [Sooratul-An’aam 8:153]

It is incumbent upon those who are prepared to call them (i.e. to Islaam) to be gentle with them and also to clarify to them that they are only inviting them (i.e. to Islaam) with the desire to save them from a lasting painful torment. The Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said to ’Alee (Ibn Abee Taalib) during the expedition of Khaybar,

“That Allaah guides through you just one person, is better for you than red camels.” [Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 2783) and Muslim (no. 2406).]

The most precious of the wealth of the Arabs in al-Jaahiliyyah (pre-Islaamic times of ignorance) was the camels. And the best of the camels were the red camels.

So the Messenger of Allaah said this to ’Alee and this hadeeth is in al-Bukhaaree and Muslim. That if Allaah guides just one person through you is better for you than having the most precious of wealth. So we ask Allaah first and foremost to guide the misguided Muslims and then that He makes the Muslims…[speech unclear]. On top of this our souls should be tranquil because the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said,

“There will not come a time, except the time that comes after it will be more evil than it, up until you meet your Lord.” [Related by al-Bukhaaree (13/22).]

Also worship will not correct except that which was legislated by Muhammad. It is not for anyone to worship from what they deem to be good. The Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said,

“Whoever does an action not in accordance with our matter, it will be rejected.” [Related by Muslim (no. 1718).]

This hadeeth is in al-Bukharee and Muslim.

[Q]: So that I may be sure, it is not permissible that we have doubt about them being disbelievers?

[A]: No, how free is Allaah from all imperfection! A person of intellect will not have doubt regarding their disbelief. The disbelievers of old from Arab did not even say that Allah took on the form of the creation!

[Q]: So it is correct that we say that they are from the original disbelievers and never entered into Islaam?

[A]: They never entered into Islaam! Those who we say about them they are apostates are those who entered into Islaam and then left it. This is another aspect. The Prophet said,

“Whoever changes their Religion then kill them.” [Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 6922).]

And there is the other hadeeth,

“The blood of a Muslim is not permissible except due to one of three: Adultery, a life for a life, or the one who changes his Religion and departs the Jamaa’ah.” [Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 6878) and Muslim (no. 1678).]

Meaning, he departs Islaam.

End of Shaykh Saalih al-Luhaydaan’s words.

Translation by Abu Suhayl Anwar Wright

NOW AVAILABLE: The Legislated Divorce by Shaykh Badee’ud-Deen as-Sindhee (d.1417H)

Click to buy $4.99

Legislated-Divorce

 The Legislated Divorce by Shaykh Badee’ud-Deen as-Sindhee (d.1417H)

The foundational principles of Islaam are based upon justice and rectification, and upon this basis, Islaam has permitted divorce in cases of helplessness. The meaning of this is, if there remains no chance of accommodation between a husband and his wife, they may release each other through divorce. This book discusses Fiqh issues regarding divorce, and it includes a glossary of Islaamic terms.

 

NEW BOOK OUT NOW: Explanation of Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhaab’s Removal of Doubts

Explanation of Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhaab’s Removing the Doubts

Sunnah Publishing » Products Page » Books » Explanation of Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhaab’s Removing the Doubts

“So this is a concise explanation upon the book of Shaykhul-Islaam Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhaab entitled, ‘Removing the Doubts of the People of Shirk’. In this book, the author mentions ten odd doubts from the people Shirk and answers them with excellent answers , relying upon textual proof along with a easily comprehensible meaning and clear expression . I ask Allaah to reward him for that and to benefit the servants through it. Indeed, Allaah is capable of all things.” Muhammad Ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen

Product in stock

Price: $16.99

http://www/SunnahPublishing.net/store

AUDIO: Death – The Destroyer Of Lust & Desire by Hasan as-Somali

A fiery khutbah delivered by our noble brother Hasan as-Somali in Philadelphia, USA pertaining to the danger of attaching oneself to the worldly affairs and falling into sins and disobedience to Allaah. He gives extra attention and warning to those lovers of Facebook and Instagram who expose their sins on social media websites, by posting pictures of themselves and others. He brings great benefits from the works of the Salaf, in particular Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah in his tremedous book Ad-Dā’i wa Dawā (The Sickness and the Cure).

[fap_track id=”2952″ layout=”list” enqueue=”no” button_enqueue=”no”]

Can I Search Through My Children’s Phone And Computer? Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan Answers!

Al-’Allaamah Saalih al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked:

[Q]: Noble Shaykh – may Allaah grant you success – the questioner asks:

“Is it permissible for me as a parent to search through the mobile phone and computer of my children, fearing that there may be something upon them?”

[A]: The Shaykh responded,

 “Yes, this is obligatory upon you. It is [mandatory] that you inspect them and look through them. How many times have I mentioned to you that you should not buy them mobile phones that have the capability to do more than [make a call] and speak on them…”

[Q]: The questioner said,

“May Allaah preserve you!  Some people say that this type of behavior on behalf of the father is deemed to be spying, which has been prohibited. Is there any truth to this statement?”

[A]: The Shaykh responded,

 “This speech is false and erroneous. The parent is commanded to nurture and educate their children, supervise them and to monitor them. It is compulsory for them do this, and this is not considered to be spying. This is fulfilling the mandatory duty that Allaah has placed upon him…”

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=134967

 

Translation by Hassan Somali