Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee on the Reality of Daesh (ISIS)

Questioner: May Allah show goodness towards you; There has been an abundant of criticism on what has been known as Daesh, and all praises belong to Allah. However, the problem is that the majority of people in this time do not know their origin and they do not know their sources, and who they separated from. Rather, you find some who attribute them, meaning those who bomb and blow up things, they attribute to them that they are merely youth, or that they have (peer) pressure (from others), or it is because of unemployment, or magic (has been placed on them), and they say other than that, so what do you advise regarding this, may Allah preserve you.

Answer: Daesh, and what will make you know who are Daesh?! Daesh is an acronym. Some say (the acronym) is like the language of engraving, just as the ant engraves within a seed until it becomes hollow and empty. So this is the language of engraving. Daesh named themselves, and they formed for themselves this acronym, this abbreviated nickname, and it befits them. They call themselves al Dawlah al Islamiyyah Fi al Iraq wa Sham (i.e. Islamic State in Iraq and Sham). So they took the letter Daal د from the word al-Dawlah, and the letter Alif after the Daal, دا stands for Islamiyyah, and the letter Ain داع stands for Iraq , and the letter Sheen stands for Sham. So it was called as an acronym داعش Daesh, meaning al-Dawlah al-Islamiyyah Fi al-Iraq wa Sham; but they have absolutely nothing to do with Islam, and Islam is free from them. Continue reading “Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee on the Reality of Daesh (ISIS)”

Prophetic Guidelines for Protection And Safety from Trials and Misguidance – al-’Allaamah Rabee’ Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee

lubaabbookIndeed, I advise myself and you with the taqwaa [1] of Allaah and ikhlaas (sincerity) [2] to Him and steadfastness upon the truth and holding fast to the Book and the Sunnah and that which the Salafus-Saalih were upon in terms of beliefs, acts of worship, manhaj (methodology) and moral character. I counsel you with these matters and advise that you give them the utmost importance.  You must direct your attention to them and form the mutual bonds of brotherhood amongst yourselves and you must inculcate mutual love amongst yourselves.  You must utilize the causes the mutual love, affection and unity and you must distance yourselves from stirring up trials and dilemmas.  And you must distance yourselves from the causes of disagreement amongst yourselves.  So such causes are many, so avoid them. Continue reading “Prophetic Guidelines for Protection And Safety from Trials and Misguidance – al-’Allaamah Rabee’ Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee”

Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee: You Want to Save Him, But He wants to Revile You by Saying: You Have Nothing but Refutations!

The Noble Scholar, al-’Allaamah Muhammad Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee – hafidhahullaah – said,

ibnhadi

“So this is the obligation upon us with regards to him.  Whenever he refutes to clarify the error and to decrease the numbers of those who fall into it and to have mercy upon the one who has erred so that no one else will follow him in that error, then his right upon us is that we honour him, not that we revile him for it.

Now the opposite occurs in these days.  The refutations are not widely spread amongst many of the people!  Instead, war is waged against the correct Sharee’ah legislated refutations, which clarify the truth and guide the creation to the command of Allaah the Blessed and Most High!  ‘They do not have anything but refutations, refutations, refutations, refutations, refutations,’ they give utterance to this speech!!

And they do not realize that these refutations:

  • Safeguard the Religion of Allaah;
  • Protect the creation of Allaah.

So the Religion of Allaah is safeguarded from distortion, and the creation of Allaah are protected from falling into what?  Into the tahreef (distortion) of the corrupt individuals and into the blunders and into following the swindlers.

So if these people (i.e. who criticize the refutations) knew the reality: the advantages and benefits that result from the refutations, they would not utter such speech.

Due to this, the people who have the largest share in this topic are the Scholars.  Due to that, they have carried out this obligation by themselves with the best undertaking.  So you will find their refutations upon the people of error, falsehood and desire from the earliest days and they have books written in that regard.

Rather, many of the books of ’aqeedah (creed) authored by Ahlus-Sunnah were only written due to the deviation of the people of innovation.  So there was a need to clarify the Sunan in all of these issues and positions and to refute whosoever opposed them.

The Difference Between Sincere Advice and Revilement - al-Haafidh Ibn Rajab al-Hanbalee (d.795H)
The Difference Between Sincere Advice and Revilement – al-Haafidh Ibn Rajab al-Hanbalee (d.795H)

Therefore, the right of these people who write Sharee’ah legislated refutations is that they be honoured, respected and venerated, not that they be reviled.  So they have acted charitably towards us by safeguarding for us our Religion and safeguarding us, but we have acted in an evil manner towards them by reviling them and defacing their images and reputations and by running the people away from them.  So this, by Allaah is an unjust recompense.  So the likes of him and the likes of you are as the speaker said, “I want him to live, but he wants me to be killed.”

So you want for him to be safe from falling into deviation and going astray, but he wants to fight you by reviling you amongst the people and defacing your reputation and running the people away from you by saying, “They have nothing but refutations!”  It is as if refutations are now thought of as unfounded and disgraced!  We ask Allaah for protection and safety.” [1]

Notes:

[1]: Taken from the fourth lesson of Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Haadee’s explanation of the book, al-Farq baynan-Naseehah wat-Ta’yeer, of Ibn Rajab (d.795H), which was part of the sessions conducted at the eleventh religious seminar held at the ’Utbah Ibn Ghazwaan mosque in Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Translation by Maaz Qureshi

Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee Disproves the False Principle: Do not Refute Them Until you Know What They Meant

[fap_track id=”3631″ layout=”list” enqueue=”no” button_enqueue=”no”]

ibnhadi[Q]: This questioner says: We have heard those who ascribe to as-Salafiyyah have formed a principle in refuting the innovator, “Do not refute him up until you know what he meant and up until you are a Scholar and so on.”  So what is the response to this?

[A]: I say: As for knowledge being a condition for the refutation, then yes.  You heard about it not too long ago.

As for the statement that you cannot refute someone up until you know what he meant, then this is speech which is in need of further detailed speech.

If his statement is apparently falsehood, then I must ask him about what he meant?!  He is only to be asked about something that is ambiguous.  As for that which is clear falsehood, then it is necessary to refute it.

If you are from those who are fit to refute and you are asked about that, or it has been obligated upon you, such that there is no one else to absolve you of this task, then it is obligatory upon you to clarify.  And we have not been commanded to investigate into the meanings of the people.  We have been commanded to take the people at face value.  The Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said,

“I am only a human being, and you people have disputes. May be someone amongst you can present his case in a more eloquent and convincing manner than the other, and I give my judgment in his favour according to what I hear. Beware! If ever I give somebody something of his brother’s right then he should not take it as I have only, given him a piece of Fire…” [1]

And he (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said to Usaamah Ibn Zayd (radiyallaahu ’anhumaa),

“Did you tear open his heart?”

This was when the man stated that there is no one worthy of worship besides Allaah, but Usaamah killed him, as Usaamah had been standing over him with the sword, so he killed him.  Usaamah replied,

“He only said it as a means of seeking protection.”

The Prophet said,

“Did you tear open his heart?” [2]

So he did not know what was inside the man’s chest and he was not held responsible for it.  He was held responsible for what was apparent.  And ’Umar (radiyallaahu ’anhu), the Leader of the Believers, said, as occurs in al-Bukhaaree,

“During the time of Prophethood, people accepted the Revelation.  As for now, then the Revelation has ceased…”

The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) had died.

“We only take the people at face value.  We bring close and favour the one who manifests goodness in front of us.  And we dismiss and distance ourselves from the one who manifests evil in front of us,” or as he – rahimahullaah – said. [3]

So we have not been commanded to investigate into the intended meanings.  Whosoever has speech that is falsehood, then falsehood must be refuted.  And if he is ignorant and he says, “I meant such and such, but I erred in the expression,” we reply, ‘The praise is for Allaah.  Therefore, you have corrected yourself.  So it is not permissible for anyone, from this point onwards, to follow you in that falsehood now that you are aware of it.’

So now you – O critic – have benefited the people firstly and him (i.e. the speaker of falsehood) secondly.

This speech (i.e. that you cannot refute someone up until you know what he meant) is incorrect.” [4]

Endnotes:

[1]: Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 2291), Muslim (no. 3237), Aboo Daawood (no. 3115), Ibn Maajah (no. 2310), at-Tirmidhee (no. 1256), an-Nisaa‘ee (no. 5683) and Ahmad in al-Musnad (no. 26016).

[2]: Related by Muslim (no. 140) and Aboo Daawood (no. 26430).

[3]: Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 2498) and Ahmad in al-Musnad (no. 288).

[4]: Taken from the recorded gathering entitled, “Thawaabit ’Aadoo ilat-Tashkeek feehaa.”

Translation by Maaz Qureshi